TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal allowed, remanded for fair hearing & evidence presentation.</h1> <h3>M/s. Unique Sales Corporation Versus Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata</h3> M/s. Unique Sales Corporation Versus Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata - TMI Issues Involved:1. Early hearing of the appeal.2. Appeal rejected as time-barred by the Commissioner (Appeals).3. Date of communication of the Order-in-Original and the delay in filing the appeal.Analysis:Issue 1: Early Hearing of the AppealThe Applicant/Appellant filed a Miscellaneous Application along with the Appeal for early hearing. Despite the absence of the Appellant on the scheduled hearing dates, the Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application for early hearing. With the consent of the Authorized Representative for the Department, the appeal itself was taken up for hearing.Issue 2: Appeal Rejected as Time-BarredThe Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal on the grounds of being time-barred, as the Order-in-Original was received by the assessee on 17.05.2021, and the appeal was filed on 14.07.2021. The Commissioner observed discrepancies in the dates mentioned by the appellant regarding the communication of the order. The Commissioner noted a delay of 64 days from the date of receiving the order by the appellant.Issue 3: Date of Communication and Delay in Filing the AppealThe Tribunal noted that even if the date of communication of the order is taken as 11.05.2021, the delay, if any, is only of 2 days, which was condoned. It was decided that the matter should be remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits without further consideration of the limitation aspect. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present evidence in their favor, and all issues were kept open for further proceedings.In conclusion, the appeal was allowed by way of remand to the Commissioner (Appeals), and the Miscellaneous Application for early hearing was disposed of. The Tribunal emphasized granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the Appellant during the proceedings before the Commissioner (Appeals).
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
