Pre-deposit discretion upheld where prima facie merits and record facts justified full deposit without any substantial legal question.

The extent of pre-deposit is a matter of judicial discretion to be exercised on the facts and prima facie merits of each case, and interference is unwarranted unless a substantial question of law arises. Here, the Tribunal considered the continued non-production of statutory forms and the prima facie position that concessional tax benefit under the Central Sales Tax framework had been claimed despite dealings with cancelled registrations, and directed full pre-deposit. The High Court declined to substitute its view for that discretion, upheld the 100% pre-deposit direction, and found no substantial question of law in the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in directing 100% pre-deposit and whether any substantial question of law arose in the appeal.

Analysis: The appeal challenged the Tribunal's exercise of discretion under the pre-deposit regime. The order recorded that the tax demand was for non-production of statutory forms, that the appellant had not produced the forms even after several years, and that the benefit of concessional tax under section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act had been availed in respect of transactions with dealers whose registrations had been cancelled. On these facts, the Tribunal formed a prima facie view that full pre-deposit was warranted. The High Court held that the extent of pre-deposit is a matter of judicial discretion to be exercised on the facts of each case and on the prima facie merits emerging from the record, and declined to substitute its own view for the Tribunal's exercise of discretion.

Conclusion: The direction requiring 100% pre-deposit was upheld and no substantial question of law was found to arise.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the Tribunal's order was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: An order directing pre-deposit will not be interfered with when the appellate authority has exercised its discretion on relevant facts and prima facie merits, unless a substantial question of law is shown to arise.

---