Tax Registration Revocation Overturned: COVID-19 Circumstances Considered, Authority Directed to Reassess Petitioner's Case Under CGST Act

HC quashed the Order-in-Appeal related to GST registration cancellation. The court found the dismissal contrary to CGST Act Sections 107 and 30. Directed tax authority to reconsider the petitioner's revocation request within two weeks, considering COVID-19 pandemic circumstances and tax compliance. Appeal was deemed maintainable, and the original order was set aside.

---

---

Issues:
1. Quashing of Order-in-Appeal No.: MYS-SPP-ADC/Jc(A)-001 to 010-2022-23 GST
2. Restoration of GST Registration
3. Maintainability of Appeal under Section 107 of CGST Act
4. Validity of Explanation for Delay in Seeking Revocation of Cancellation
5. Direction to Reconsider Revocation of Cancellation Order

Quashing of Order-in-Appeal:
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari to quash the Order-in-Appeal related to GST registration cancellation. The petitioner's appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Authority, stating the only option was to approach for revocation. The Court held that the dismissal was contrary to Section 107 and Section 30 of the CGST Act. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the petition.

Restoration of GST Registration:
The petitioner's GST registration was revoked during the COVID-19 lockdown, leading to an appeal for restoration. The petitioner had paid due taxes and deposited additional amounts. The Court directed the authority to reconsider the revocation request, considering the petitioner's explanation for the delay and subject to payment of outstanding taxes.

Maintainability of Appeal under Section 107:
The Court emphasized that the availability of the remedy for seeking revocation of cancellation does not render an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act non-maintainable. The Appellate Authority's dismissal on this ground was deemed incorrect and against the provisions of the Act.

Validity of Explanation for Delay:
The petitioner's explanation for not seeking revocation within the stipulated period due to the COVID-19 pandemic was accepted as valid and proper. The Court directed the authority to reconsider the revocation request, taking into account the circumstances and the petitioner's compliance with tax obligations.

Direction to Reconsider Revocation:
The Court allowed the petition, setting aside the impugned order and directing the authority to reconsider the revocation of GST registration. The authority was instructed to make a decision within two weeks from the date of the order, disregarding any communication issued during the pendency of the petition.

This judgment highlights the importance of procedural compliance, the right to appeal under the CGST Act, and considerations for delays due to unforeseen circumstances like the COVID-19 pandemic.

---