Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported scale models were required to comply with the toy import policy conditions under Chapter 95 of ITC (HS), 2017, including the revised requirement of random sample testing under Policy Condition No. 2(iii), and whether the Tribunal's remand order called for interference.
Analysis: The import was examined under the policy governing toys in EXIM Codes 95030010, 95030020, 95030030 and 95030090. The dispute turned on whether the goods were merely collectible models excluded from the toy regime or were in substance toys attracting the prescribed BIS standards and certification requirements. The revised Policy Condition No. 2(iii) contemplated random drawal of a sample from each consignment for testing by NABL-accredited laboratories, and not multiple samples from each type of model. On the facts recorded, the apprehension that compliance would entail wholesale destruction of the consignment was unfounded. The Tribunal's view that the import policy conditions had to be satisfied was therefore upheld.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the appellant and in favour of the Revenue. The remand order of the Tribunal was left undisturbed and the appeal was dismissed.