Maharashtra contractor must get separate GST registration in Odisha for railway works execution

The AAR Odisha ruled that a Maharashtra-based contractor executing railway works in Odisha must obtain separate GST registration in Odisha. The authority determined that the location of supplier for works contract services is at the project site in Odisha, not the contractor's principal place of business in Maharashtra. Since the contractor must establish permanent infrastructure including sheds, storehouses, and technical resources at the Odisha railway site for contract execution, this constitutes an "establishment" under IGST Act provisions. The contractor is therefore required to register under both Odisha SGST and CGST Acts for providing works contract services to East Coast Railway.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether separate GST registration is required in Odisha state.
2. Whether E-tender document/LOA would suffice as address proof.
3. Tax implications on purchasing goods from Maharashtra and shipping directly to Odisha.
4. Tax implications on purchasing goods from a dealer in Odisha for use in Odisha.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Separate GST Registration in Odisha:
The primary issue addressed in the judgment is whether the Applicant is required to obtain a separate GST registration in Odisha for executing works contract services. The Applicant contended that since the place of supply is Odisha and the location of the supplier is Maharashtra, IGST should be charged, and no separate registration in Odisha is required. However, the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) concluded that the nature of the works contract necessitates a fixed establishment in Odisha. The contract involves substantial work, including the construction of major bridges and other allied works, which requires maintaining temporary site offices and deploying significant human and technical resources in Odisha. Therefore, the Applicant is required to be registered under the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for the works contract services provided to East Coast Railway, Odisha.

2. E-tender Document/LOA as Address Proof:
The Applicant queried whether the E-tender document/LOA would suffice as address proof for registration purposes. The AAR did not provide a ruling on this question, stating that it does not fall under the issues on which advance ruling can be sought under Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.

3. Tax Implications on Purchasing Goods from Maharashtra and Shipping Directly to Odisha:
Since the AAR concluded that the Applicant is required to obtain registration in Odisha, the questions regarding the tax implications on purchasing goods from Maharashtra and shipping directly to Odisha (whether CGST & SGST or IGST would be charged) were not addressed.

4. Tax Implications on Purchasing Goods from a Dealer in Odisha for Use in Odisha:
Similarly, the question regarding the tax implications on purchasing goods from a dealer in Odisha for use in Odisha (whether IGST or CGST & SGST would be charged) was also not addressed due to the affirmative answer to the first question.

Conclusion:
The AAR ruled that the Applicant is required to be registered under the Odisha GST Act and the Central GST Act for the works contract services provided in Odisha. The nature of the contract and the requirement to maintain a fixed establishment in Odisha necessitate such registration. The AAR did not provide a ruling on whether the E-tender document/LOA could be used as address proof for registration purposes, and the other tax implication questions were not addressed due to the affirmative ruling on the need for separate registration in Odisha.

---