1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court affirms tax treatment of lease rentals as revenue receipt</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the respondent-assessee's ownership of the plant and machinery, leading to lease rentals being taxed as ... Owner of the plant for the purpose of section 32 - Income generated through lease - Scope of terms 'own', 'ownership' and 'owned' Revenue receipt/income accrued - HELD THAT:- On construing the relevant clauses, it is apparent that the respondent-assessee had become the owner of the plant and machinery. Further the lease rentals in entirety have been taxed as a revenue receipt/income accrued and taxable. In view of the aforesaid factual background, we do not find any good ground and reason to interfere with the final conclusion and decision of the High Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as the respondent-assessee was deemed the owner of the plant and machinery, and lease rentals were taxed as revenue receipt. No interference with the High Court's decision was found.