TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court sets aside assessment order and notices under Income Tax Act due to failure to provide mandatory documents.</h1> <h3>Hero Fincorp Limited Versus National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi (Earlier National Eassessment Centre Delhi) & Anr.</h3> The court set aside the assessment order dated 30th April, 2021, and the consequential notices issued under the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the petitioner ... Validity of faceless assessment u/s 144B - Validity of notices issued u/s 156 and Section 274 read with Section 270A HELD THAT:- In the present case, admittedly, no show cause notice, as contemplated under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the Act was served on the petitioner, thereby depriving the petitioner of its statutory right to file a response as well as place the documents on record in support of its response and to be heard before passing of the final assessment order. We therefore, set aside the assessment order and the consequential notices issued under Section 156 and Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Act and remand the matter to the respondent No. 1 to complete the assessment proceedings within a period of twelve weeks from today, in accordance with law. Issues:Challenging assessment order dated 30th April, 2021 and consequential notices under Income Tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the assessment order dated 30th April, 2021, and the subsequent notices issued under Section 156 and Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessment order was passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Act, raising a significant tax and interest demand without serving the petitioner with the mandatory draft assessment order along with a show cause notice as required by Section 144B of the Act. The declared income of the petitioner was varied to its prejudice without providing an opportunity to respond. The respondent sought time to review the matter, and the operation of the impugned orders was stayed.The counsel for the respondent informed the court that they received instructions to set aside the impugned orders and remand the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination. The court noted that under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the Act, the National Faceless Assessment Centre was required to provide an opportunity to the assessee to show cause before making any prejudicial variation to the income. However, in this case, no show cause notice was served on the petitioner, depriving them of the statutory right to respond and present supporting documents before the final assessment order was passed.Consequently, the court set aside the assessment order dated 30th April, 2021, and the consequential notices issued under various sections of the Act. The matter was remanded to the respondent No. 1 to complete the assessment proceedings within twelve weeks in compliance with the law. The court clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the controversy in the writ petition. With these directions, the writ petition was disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
