1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Jurisdictional Shift: High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal, Emphasizes Territorial Filing</h1> The High Court dismissed an Income Tax Appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the Assessee's registered office had shifted from Noida to ... Delhi High court territorial jurisdiction to entertain and decide this appeal - HELD THAT:- The initial registered office of the Assessee was Noida (U.P) and the assessment order as well as remand report and order in appeal have been passed by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) based in Noida. After amalgamation, the Appellantβs registered office is now situated in Bangalore. Even the appeal has been preferred by the Principal CIT, Bangalore. Accordingly, present appeal is dismissed on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction. However, the Appellant is given liberty to file the appeal in a Court having territorial jurisdiction. The Appellant is also given liberty to file an application seeking condonation of delay along with the appeal, if any, to be filed. Needless to state that the same shall be considered on its own merits. Issues Involved: Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction, Income Tax AppealLack of Territorial Jurisdiction:The High Court dealt with an Income Tax Appeal challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2009-10. The Court noted that it had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain and decide the appeal. The Assessee's initial registered office was in Noida, where the assessment order and other relevant documents were issued. However, post-amalgamation, the Assessee's registered office shifted to Bangalore. The appeal was also filed by the Principal CIT in Bangalore. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The Appellant was granted liberty to file the appeal in a Court with the appropriate territorial jurisdiction. Additionally, the Appellant could seek condonation of delay, if necessary, along with the appeal, with the assurance that such application would be considered on its merits.Income Tax Appeal:The Income Tax Appeal was filed challenging the ITAT's order dated 28th February, 2020. The Court's analysis of the paper book revealed the jurisdictional issue due to the change in the Assessee's registered office location from Noida to Bangalore post-amalgamation. The Court's decision to dismiss the appeal was primarily based on the lack of territorial jurisdiction of the High Court to adjudicate on the matter. The Appellant was directed to file the appeal in a Court having the requisite territorial jurisdiction, with the option to seek condonation of any delay in filing. This detailed analysis underscores the importance of territorial jurisdiction in legal proceedings and the procedural steps available to parties to rectify jurisdictional issues for a fair adjudication of their appeals.