Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Challenge to an order passed under Section 74(9) of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, including the petitioner's contention that the amount received as Viability Gap Fund was a subsidy outside the scope of "consideration" and the respondents' objection that the matter involved disputed facts and an alternate statutory remedy.
Analysis: The matter was taken up at the notice stage. The Court noticed the rival contentions on the taxability of the Viability Gap Fund and the plea regarding the appropriate taxing authority, but did not render a final adjudication on the merits of the levy or jurisdiction. Pending further hearing, the Court granted limited interim protection against coercive recovery on condition of a partial deposit.
Outcome: Notice was issued and interim protection against coercive recovery of the remaining demand was granted subject to deposit of Rs. 65 lakhs by the stipulated date.