TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, deleting additions for employee contributions to Provident Fund and State Insurance Fund.</h1> <h3>Ultra Clean and Care Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore</h3> Ultra Clean and Care Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore - TMI Issues:Appeal against the Order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissing the assessee's appeal contesting the processing of its return of income under section 143(1) for the Assessment Year 2018-19.Analysis:The Tribunal examined the issue of adding the Employees' contribution to the Employee Provident Fund and Employee State Insurance Fund to the assessee's returned income under section 143(1)(a). The Revenue relied on various decisions to support the addition, but the Tribunal, in the case of Nikhil Mohine, held that due to the cleavage of judicial opinion and the limited scope of adjustment under section 143(1)(a), the matter could not be decided on merits. The Tribunal emphasized the need to respect decisions by the Hon'ble High Courts and highlighted the importance of legislative intent in interpreting the law. It concluded that the Explanations inserted by Finance Act, 2021, clarified the issue of employee contributions and were retrospective in nature.The Tribunal further discussed that the Explanations were proposed as prospective amendments but clarified that they should take effect from Assessment Year 2021-22 based on the documents related to the Finance Bill, 2021. The Tribunal emphasized the limited scope of adjustment under section 143(1)(a) and the necessity of a decision by the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court to justify additions. As no such decision was presented, the Tribunal ruled that the Explanations were not retrospective for the relevant year, leading to the impugned additions failing to stand.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the deletion of the impugned additions. The decision was made based on the absence of a decision by the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court justifying the additions and the prospective nature of the Explanations related to employee contributions. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of legislative intent and the need for decisions to be in conformity with the law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
