Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a supplier of goods to an EOU or EPCG licence holder is entitled to refund of terminal excise duty, and whether the amount, if already paid, can be granted as credit in the petitioner's electronic credit register.
Analysis: The entitlement under the Foreign Trade Policy was held to accrue to the DTA supplier as part of the deemed export scheme, subject to the policy conditions, including the bar against availment of CENVAT credit or rebate and the requirement of the necessary disclaimer where applicable. The policy circular relied on by the authorities could not override the substantive entitlement recognised under the policy. The Court further noted that the petitioner had in fact paid the duty and that the post-GST regime required the relief to be worked out by credit rather than cash refund, in line with the approach adopted in the governing precedent.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to relief, and the impugned orders rejecting the claims were set aside.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were allowed and the authorities were directed to grant credit of the duty amount in the petitioner's electronic credit register within the stipulated time.
Ratio Decidendi: A supplier making deemed exports under the Foreign Trade Policy is entitled to terminal excise duty relief if the policy conditions are satisfied, and after the transition to GST the relief may be worked out through credit where cash refund is not the permissible mode.