Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal orders refund with interest at 12% per annum under Section 35FF.</h1> <h3>M/s Jai Bhawani Concast Pvt Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Central Goods and Service Tax-Alwar</h3> M/s Jai Bhawani Concast Pvt Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Central Goods and Service Tax-Alwar - TMI Issues:1. Reduction of refund amount in the nature of predeposit2. Allowance of interest under Section 35FF of the ActAnalysis:1. The appellant, engaged in the manufacture of SS Ingots, deposited amounts during an investigation in December 2002 and January 2003 towards estimated duty on alleged shortages. A show cause notice issued in September 2006 confirmed a demand for central excise duty and disallowed Cenvat credit. After appeals, the demand was partially set aside in a final order dated January 2020, confirming duty of Rs. 5,76,425.2. Subsequently, the appellant sought a refund of the deposited amounts, including a pre-deposit made pursuant to a stay order. The Adjudicating Authority allowed a refund of the principal amount but denied interest. Both the appellant and the revenue appealed before the Commissioner (Appeals), with the revenue arguing that the claim for the Rs. 50,000 deposit in January 2003 was time-barred under Section 11B of the Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) held the refund of Rs. 8 lakhs to be valid but found the refund of Rs. 50,000 time-barred and hit by unjust enrichment.3. The Commissioner (Appeals) also addressed the issue of interest under Section 35FF, stating that interest is payable only on the amount required to be deposited at the time of filing the appeal. The appellant contended that interest should be paid on amounts paid during investigation and pre-deposit, citing precedents where interest was allowed under similar circumstances by higher authorities and courts.4. The Tribunal considered relevant case laws, including decisions by Division Benches and High Courts, supporting the payment of interest on amounts deposited during investigations. Relying on these precedents, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to a refund of the Rs. 50,000 deposit and interest on the full amount of Rs. 8.5 lakhs at a rate of 12% per annum from the date of deposit till the date of refund under Section 35FF of the Act.5. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It directed the Adjudicating Authority to grant the balance refund and interest within 60 days from the date of receipt of the order, emphasizing the appellant's entitlement to both the refund and interest as per the provisions of the Act.