Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in proceedings under Section 64(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, the Commissioner alone must form the requisite satisfaction and pass the audit order, and whether such power can be delegated to a lower authority.
Analysis: Section 64(4) empowers the Commissioner to order audit of a registered dealer's business by an officer not below the prescribed rank. The provision contemplates an individualised exercise of power based on the Commissioner's own application of mind to the dealer's default or other statutory criteria. The order is not administrative in nature but quasi-judicial, because it entails civil consequences and can be used against the assessee in assessment proceedings. For that reason, prior notice, opportunity of hearing, and a speaking and reasoned order are required. The statutory scheme does not authorise the Commissioner to delegate this decision-making function further to a lower authority.
Conclusion: The Commissioner cannot delegate the power under Section 64(4) to a lower authority, and the impugned direction permitting such delegation was unsustainable. The appellant succeeded on this issue.
Ratio Decidendi: An order under Section 64(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act is a quasi-judicial, non-delegable statutory power that must be exercised by the Commissioner himself after notice, hearing, and recording of reasons.