High Court invalidates assessment against deceased under Income Tax Act, emphasizing need for legal representation

The High Court set aside the assessment order and demand notice issued to a deceased person under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Citing legal precedents, the court held that proceedings against a deceased assessee are null and void unless legal representatives participate. The court emphasized that mere intimation of death does not constitute legal representation and that notices to deceased individuals do not fall under Section 292BB. Consequently, the court invalidated the assessment proceedings, highlighting the importance of legal representation and ruling in favor of the petitioner.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to assessment order and demand notice under Income Tax Act, 1961 based on the validity of notice issued to a deceased person.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner sought to set aside an assessment order and demand notice issued by the Income Tax Authority under Sections 144 and 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner, being the son of the deceased, argued that the notice issued to the deceased after her death was invalid and illegal.

2. The petitioner informed the authorities about the death of the deceased and forwarded the death certificate. Despite this, the Income Tax Authority proceeded with the assessment process. The petitioner contended that the proceedings against a dead person are null and void based on legal precedents and the law.

3. The High Court referred to the case of Urmilaben Anirudhhasinji Jadeja Vs. Income Tax Officer, where it was held that assessment against a dead person is a legal nullity. The court emphasized that proceedings against a deceased assessee can only be maintained if legal representatives participate in the assessment proceedings.

4. The court clarified that mere intimation of the death of the assessee does not constitute legal representation. It further discussed the applicability of Section 292BB of the Act, stating that it does not apply when notices are issued to a deceased assessee, rendering the proceedings without authority of law.

5. The judgment highlighted that assessment against a dead person is not permissible, and any attempt to do so is considered a jurisdictional defect. The court reiterated that no assessment can be framed against a deceased individual, emphasizing the importance of legal representation in assessment proceedings.

6. Ultimately, the court allowed the petition, setting aside the assessment order, demand notice, and subsequent orders issued against the deceased person. The court held that the notice issued to the deceased assessee was not sustainable, in line with established legal principles and previous judgments.

7. The judgment concluded by granting the petition in favor of the petitioner, thereby invalidating the assessment proceedings conducted against the deceased individual and emphasizing the necessity of legal representation in such cases.

---