Tribunal upholds Income Tax Act revision, dismisses appeal on deceased person's notice validity. Legal rep participation suffices.

The tribunal upheld the revision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal challenging the validity of the notice issued in the name of a deceased person. It was deemed that participation by the legal representative sufficed, and the absence of verification in the assessment of agricultural income justified the exercise of revisionary power. The tribunal directed the assessing officer to re-examine the agricultural income claim and issue a detailed order, citing Explanation 2 to section 263(1) as the basis for their decision.

---

---

Issues:
1. Validity of revision under section 263 due to notice issued in the name of a deceased person.
2. Jurisdictional aspects regarding the assumption of jurisdiction under section 263.
3. Proper exercise of revisionary power by questioning the absence of verification in assessment regarding agricultural income disclosed by the assessee.

Issue 1: Validity of Revision under Section 263
The appeal challenges the revision order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the notice was issued in the name of a deceased person, leading to the argument that the proceedings were null and void. The appellant contends that a fresh notice should have been issued on the legal representative of the deceased. However, the tribunal finds the challenge not valid in law, citing precedents where participation in proceedings by the legal representative was deemed sufficient, and non-acceptance of the deceased's status as a procedural irregularity rather than a nullity.

Issue 2: Jurisdictional Aspects
The tribunal further discusses the aspect of jurisdiction, emphasizing that the notice under section 263 is not a jurisdictional notice but serves to provide an opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The tribunal refers to various judgments to support the view that the absence of communication regarding the death of the assessee to the assessing authority does not invalidate the proceedings, as long as the legal representative is impleaded and given a chance to be heard.

Issue 3: Exercise of Revisionary Power
Regarding the absence of verification in the assessment of agricultural income, the tribunal upholds the revisionary authority's power to question this aspect, especially when the assessing officer failed to verify the claims. The tribunal highlights that agricultural income must be properly verified, and the assessing officer should have sought approval to examine this aspect, as mandated by the Board Circular.

In conclusion, the tribunal dismisses the assessee's appeal, upholding the revision under section 263 based on the grounds of lack of inquiry and the proper exercise of revisionary power. The tribunal directs the assessing officer to re-examine the agricultural income claim and issue a speaking order with definite findings of fact. The decision is based on the clauses of Explanation 2 to section 263(1), and no interference is warranted.

---