2022 (9) TMI 1125 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

Tribunal Initiates Insolvency Proceedings, Appoints Interim Resolution Professional

Mr Pramod Kumar Versus M/s Newcon Engineers Private Limited

Mr Pramod Kumar Versus M/s Newcon Engineers Private Limited - TMI Issues Involved:1. Maintainability of the petition on technical grounds.2. Applicability of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Money Lending Act, 1976.3. Quantum of debt and its compliance with the pecuniary threshold limit.4. Classification of the debt as 'Financial Debt' and the applicant as 'Financial Creditor'.Detailed Analysis:1. Maintainability of the Petition on Technical Grounds:The corporate debtor contended that the petition was not maintainable due to issues related to the authorization of the signatory and the date of default. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Dena Bank vs C. Shivakumar Reddy & Anr, which held that there is no bar to the amendment of pleadings or the filing of additional documents in an application under Section 7 of the IBC. The applicant had complied with the Tribunal's order dated 17.05.2022, curing the defects regarding signing and authorization. The amended petition was duly executed and signed by Mr. Pritam Kumar with an authorization letter. Thus, the Tribunal found no merit in the corporate debtor's contention on this technical ground.2. Applicability of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Money Lending Act, 1976:The corporate debtor argued that the applicant was subject to the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Money Lending Act, 1976, which requires registration for money lending. The Tribunal emphasized that Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, provides that the Code has overriding effect over any other law. Citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Indus Biotech (P) Ltd. v. Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund, the Tribunal held that the IBC overrides all other laws. Therefore, the Tribunal did not delve into the applicability of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Money Lending Act, 1976, and upheld the statutory right of the applicant under Section 7 of the Code.3. Quantum of Debt and Pecuniary Threshold Limit:The corporate debtor contended that the outstanding amount was below the threshold limit of Rs. 1 Crore as prescribed under Section 4 of the Code. The Tribunal noted that the applicant had claimed an amount of Rs. 1,65,53,664/- in Part-IV of Form-1, which included both principal and interest. The Tribunal found that the interest and principal both constitute financial debt under Section 3(12) of the Code. Since the total financial debt in default exceeded the pecuniary threshold limit, the petition was deemed maintainable.4. Classification of the Debt as 'Financial Debt' and the Applicant as 'Financial Creditor':The corporate debtor argued that the debt did not qualify as 'Financial Debt' and the applicant was not a 'Financial Creditor' as per Sections 5(8) and 5(7) of the Code. The Tribunal examined the loan agreement dated 06.05.2018 and supporting documents, noting that the loan was disbursed against interest calculated at 3% per month, which constitutes the time value of money. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's ruling in Jaypee Infratech case, which clarified that a debt must be disbursed against the consideration for time value of money to be classified as 'financial debt'. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction met the criteria for 'Financial Debt' and the applicant was a 'Financial Creditor'.Conclusion:The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. Mr. Sanyam Goel was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional. The Tribunal declared a moratorium as per Section 14 of the Code and directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 2 Lakhs with the Interim Resolution Professional to cover the initial expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the duty of the Interim Resolution Professional to manage the affairs of the corporate debtor with utmost dedication and in accordance with the provisions of the Code.