TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal grants relief to tea seller, citing lack of tax knowledge and practical challenges</h1> <h3>Shri Ram Chand Versus The ITO, Ward 5 (1), Chandigarh</h3> Shri Ram Chand Versus The ITO, Ward 5 (1), Chandigarh - TMI Issues Involved:1. Reopening of assessment under section 147/148 based on cash deposits in bank account.2. Addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for unexplained cash deposits.Analysis:Issue 1: Reopening of assessment under section 147/148 based on cash deposits in bank account:The case involves an appeal by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Chandigarh pertaining to Assessment Year 2010-11. The Income Tax Department received information about cash deposits of Rs. 15,02,000 in the assessee's bank account. The AO invoked section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, adding the amount to the assessee's income as unexplained. The assessee contended that the cash was received from a family friend for an auction bid, but failed to provide sufficient evidence. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the addition due to lack of evidence from the family friend. The Tribunal considered the reopening of assessment and the legality of the addition under section 68.Issue 2: Addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for unexplained cash deposits:The assessee challenged the addition under section 68, arguing that bank passbooks are not recognized as books of account. The AO and Ld. CIT(A) found the explanation unsatisfactory due to lack of evidence and contradictory facts in the assessment order. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the assessment process, including the assessee not being afforded proper opportunities and the assessment being passed ex parte. The Tribunal acknowledged the unique circumstances of the case, where the assessee, a small tea and pakoda seller, lacked understanding of tax laws. Considering the impossibility of obtaining confirmation from the deceased family friend, the Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)'s order and directed the AO to delete the addition under section 68.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing the need for a sympathetic view based on the peculiar facts of the case. The judgment highlights the importance of considering individual circumstances and practical challenges faced by taxpayers, especially those with limited knowledge of tax laws.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
