Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the show cause notices demanding differential customs duty on goods cleared from bond warehouse were jurisdiction where the duty was assessed by reference to the date of actual removal from the warehouse rather than the date of import.
Analysis: For goods cleared from a warehouse, the relevant date for determining the applicable rate of duty is the date of actual removal from the warehouse under Section 15(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with the warehousing provisions. The notices proceeded on the assumption that the higher rate prevailing on the date of import controlled liability, although the goods had been cleared after the notification reducing duty and duty had been collected accordingly. The notices therefore rested on a mistaken legal premise and could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The show cause notices were without jurisdiction and were quashed, in favour of the petitioner.