Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice seeking to recompute turnover and deny concessional tax benefit for the assessment year 2003-04 was valid when issued long after the original assessment and beyond the limitation period.
Analysis: The original assessment had already been completed after verification of the accounts and supporting documents. The impugned notice attempted to reopen the settled assessment, recompute turnover, reject the claimed exemption under the Central Sales Tax regime, and demand tax with interest. Section 18 of the Puducherry General Sales Tax Act, 1967 prescribed a five-year limitation for assessment of escaped turnover, which had expired much earlier than the impugned notice. A notice of this nature could not validly bypass the statutory bar or substitute an assessment in the guise of a notice. The proposed criminal consequences also could not survive because determination of escapement within the prescribed limitation was a necessary precondition.
Conclusion: The notice was held to be invalid and was quashed. The challenge succeeded in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment attempt and consequential demand were set aside for being time-barred and legally unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A completed sales tax assessment cannot be reopened by a demand notice beyond the statutory limitation for escaped turnover, and criminal consequences predicated on such escapement cannot be pursued unless the escapement is first validly determined within time.