TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction Rule for Income Tax Assessments</h1> <h3>M/s. A.G. Peripherals Versus ACIT, Circle : 41 (1) New Delhi.</h3> M/s. A.G. Peripherals Versus ACIT, Circle : 41 (1) New Delhi. - TMI Issues:Appeals against disallowance of deduction under section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2012-13 and 2015-16.Analysis:The appeals were filed by the assessee against orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirming the disallowance of deduction under section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, which was sustained by the ld. CIT (Appeals) following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Classic Binding Industries. The Supreme Court in Classic Binding Industries held that once an assessee starts claiming deduction under section 80-IC and the initial assessment year commences within 10 years, there cannot be any initial year, allowing 100% deduction in the next 5 years based on substantial expansion of the unit.However, the Supreme Court in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Aarham Softronics held that if an assessee avails of 100% deduction for the first 5 years and then at 25% for the next 5 years, and carries out substantial expansion within 10 years, the year of substantial expansion becomes the initial year for claiming 100% deduction. The total period of deduction should not exceed 10 years. The decision in Classic Binding Industries was deemed not good law, and the legal position was clarified regarding the definition of 'initial assessment year' under section 80-IC.The assessee, engaged in manufacturing battery components, set up its unit in 2006 and undertook substantial expansion in 2011-12. The claim for deduction was denied, but following the judgment in Pr. CIT Vs. Aarham Softronics, it was held that the year of substantial expansion is the initial assessment year within the 10-year period for claiming deduction under section 80-IC. Thus, the assessee was entitled to the deduction for the relevant assessment years, and the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals) was reversed to allow the claim under section 80-IC. The appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.This detailed analysis of the legal judgment provides insight into the interpretation of section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act and the implications of substantial expansion on the eligibility for deduction. The clarification provided by the Supreme Court in Pr. CIT Vs. Aarham Softronics regarding the initial assessment year and the total period of deduction is crucial in determining the entitlement of the assessee to claim deductions under section 80-IC.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
