Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court remands matter to Customs for re-examining shipping bill amendment request for MEIS benefits. Petitioner granted hearing.</h1> <h3>Vishnu Barium Private Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Export Assessment), Directorate General of Foreign Trade, The Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade Sripriya comple, Directorate General of Systems and Data management Represented by its Director General, Union of India, Commissioner of Customs</h3> Vishnu Barium Private Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Export Assessment), Directorate General of Foreign Trade, The Deputy Director General ... Issues Involved:1. Amendment of shipping bills to claim MEIS benefits.2. Adherence to time limits for amendments as per Trade Facilitation Notice.3. Applicability of Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 for amendments.4. Validity of rejection of amendment request without a hearing.5. Impact of Notification No. 26/2015-20 dated 16.09.2021 on the petitioner's claim.Detailed Analysis:1. Amendment of Shipping Bills to Claim MEIS Benefits:The petitioner, engaged in the manufacture and export of Barium Carbonate, sought to amend 59 shipping bills to claim benefits under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS). The error occurred when the petitioner's agent inadvertently selected 'No' in the reward column instead of 'Yes' while uploading the shipping bills on the Electronic Data Interface (EDI) system. Despite the petitioner's declaration of intent to claim MEIS rewards, the request for amendment was rejected by the Customs Authorities.2. Adherence to Time Limits for Amendments as per Trade Facilitation Notice:The Customs Authorities cited the Trade Facilitation Notice No. 02/2015-CUS dated 07.05.2015, which stipulates that requests for amendment of shipping bills must be made within one month from the date of the Letter of Export Order (LEO). Since the petitioner's request was made several years after the shipping bills were filed, it was deemed non-compliant with the stipulated time frame.3. Applicability of Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 for Amendments:Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 allows amendments to shipping bills based on documentary evidence existing at the time of export. The Customs Authorities argued that since the petitioner had filed the shipping bills electronically indicating 'No' for MEIS benefits, the amendment could not be permitted under Section 149. The petitioner contended that the mistake was inadvertent and should be rectified to reflect their true intent.4. Validity of Rejection of Amendment Request Without a Hearing:The petitioner argued that the rejection of their amendment request without an opportunity for a hearing was improper and violated principles of natural justice. The Customs Authorities' decision to reject the amendment request was based on the closure of Export General Manifests (EGMs) and the shipping bills being in HIST status, which precluded amendments in the EDI system.5. Impact of Notification No. 26/2015-20 dated 16.09.2021 on the Petitioner's Claim:The petitioner relied on Notification No. 26/2015-20, which extended the last date for submitting online applications for scrip-based schemes, including MEIS, to 31.12.2021 for exports made from 01.07.2018 to 31.03.2020. The petitioner argued that this notification should entitle them to claim MEIS benefits for the specified periods, as they had approached the authorities within the extended timeline.Conclusion:The court considered the petitioner's arguments and the factual aspects of the case, including the applicability of the Notification dated 16.09.2021. It was deemed appropriate to remand the matter back to the first respondent (Customs Authorities) to re-examine the petitioner's request in light of the notification and pass orders in accordance with the law. The court directed that an opportunity for a hearing be provided to the petitioner to address any legal issues involved. The writ petition was thus disposed of, with no order as to costs, and any pending interlocutory applications were closed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found