Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petitions challenging the assessment orders under Section 74(1) of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were maintainable in view of the statutory appeal remedy under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and whether the orders were vitiated by breach of natural justice.
Analysis: The petitioner had filed replies to the notices and, in Form GST DRC-06, consciously declined the option of personal hearing. On that basis, the orders could not be treated as having been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. Since an efficacious appellate remedy was available under Section 107, the writ jurisdiction was not to be invoked against the assessment orders.
Conclusion: The writ petitions were not maintainable and were liable to be dismissed, with liberty to pursue the statutory appeals.