Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (9) TMI 585 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on brought forward losses but upholds order on long-term capital gains The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee, quashing the PCIT's order regarding the verification of brought forward losses but upholding the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on brought forward losses but upholds order on long-term capital gains

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee, quashing the PCIT's order regarding the verification of brought forward losses but upholding the order concerning the verification of long-term capital gains exemption based on STT paid. The AO's order under section 143(3) was set aside only to the extent of verifying the long-term capital gains exemption.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of the order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Examination of brought forward short-term capital losses.
                            3. Verification of Securities Transaction Tax (STT) paid for claiming long-term capital gains exemption.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of the order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act:
                            The assessee challenged the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under section 263, asserting it was opposed to law, equity, and the facts of the case. The PCIT had ordered a revision of the assessment made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, citing the order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The Tribunal noted that for section 263 to be invoked, two conditions must be satisfied: the order must be erroneous, and it must be prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The Tribunal referenced the Bombay High Court's decision in Gabriel India Ltd., which clarified that an order cannot be deemed erroneous unless it is not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal found that the PCIT had not provided material evidence to substantiate that the brought forward losses set off against the current year's gains were incorrect. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the PCIT's order did not meet the conditions required under section 263 and quashed the order to the extent of the verification of brought forward losses.

                            2. Examination of brought forward short-term capital losses:
                            The PCIT had observed that the AO did not verify the veracity of the brought forward short-term capital losses set off against the current year's gains. The assessee provided detailed year-wise information of brought forward losses from AY 2009-10 to 2017-18, which was submitted to the AO during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal noted that the AO had conducted a detailed enquiry and had applied his mind before accepting the set-off of brought forward losses. The Tribunal also observed that the verification of losses from AY 2009-10 was beyond the scope of the current assessment year (AY 2017-18). Furthermore, the losses had been scrutinized and accepted by the Revenue in the assessment proceedings for AY 2015-16. Thus, the Tribunal held that the PCIT's revisionary powers under section 263 were not justified in this context and quashed the order regarding the verification of brought forward losses.

                            3. Verification of Securities Transaction Tax (STT) paid for claiming long-term capital gains exemption:
                            The PCIT had also held the AO's order to be erroneous for not verifying the STT paid data before allowing the long-term capital gains exemption. The assessee submitted that the details of STT paid were furnished in Form 10DB and that the AO had called for and received these details during the assessment proceedings. However, the Tribunal noted that the AO's order did not explicitly state that he had verified and reconciled the long-term capital gains claimed as exempt with the amount furnished in Form 10DB. The Tribunal agreed with the PCIT that this constituted a lack of proper verification, justifying the invocation of section 263. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the PCIT's order to the extent that the AO's order was set aside for the limited purpose of verifying the long-term capital gains claimed as exempt based on the STT paid.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee. It quashed the PCIT's order regarding the verification of brought forward losses but upheld the order concerning the verification of long-term capital gains exemption based on STT paid. The AO's order under section 143(3) was set aside only to the extent of verifying the long-term capital gains exemption.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found