Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amount deposited as mandatory statutory pre-deposit while filing the tax appeals was refundable with interest after the corporate debtor's liabilities stood extinguished under the approved resolution plan.
Analysis: The pre-deposit was made as a condition for entertainment of the appeals under Section 82(3) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Once the insolvency resolution process culminated in an approved resolution plan, the department's claim stood confined to the amount admitted in the resolution process and all pre-resolution dues beyond that amount stood extinguished. The appellate disputes therefore became infructuous, and the Department could not retain sums received in excess of the liability crystallised under the resolution plan. The refund provisions under Section 53 of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Rule 27 of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Rules, 2006 supported reimbursement of excess amounts, with interest where refund became due.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit amount was refundable with interest, and the rejection of the refund claim was unsustainable.