TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Questions GST Rule 21A's Fairness, Suspends Registration Cancellation and Demands Hearing Rights for Taxpayers</h1> <h3>SAT Industries Limited, Through Mr. Harikant Turgalia Versus Union of India, Through The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance & Anr.</h3> HC addressed a GST registration suspension challenge, finding the omission of 'reasonable opportunity to be heard' in Rule 21A potentially violates ... Cancellation of Registration of petitioner - order has been issued in the show cause notice itself without affording any opportunity to Petitioner of being heard - principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- A registered person whose registration has been suspended cannot make any taxable supply during the period of suspension and shall not be granted any refund during the period of suspension. Therefore, Petitioner is challenging the omission of the words “after affording the said person a reasonable opportunity of being heard” in Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 21A of the CGST Rules, 2017. Registry to issue notice - Petition to be listed on 10/10/2022. Issues:1. Suspension of GST registration without affording an opportunity to be heard.2. Challenge against the omission of the words 'after affording the said person a reasonable opportunity of being heard' in Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 21A of the CGST Rules, 2017.3. Challenge against both CGST and MGST Rules.4. Notice to be issued to the Attorney General of India and the Advocate General.5. Ad-interim stay in terms of prayer clause (c) pending the hearing and final disposal of the petition.Analysis:The High Court of Bombay addressed the issue of the Petitioner being issued a show cause notice for the cancellation of their GST registration without being given an opportunity to be heard. The Petitioner contended that the omission of the provision for a reasonable opportunity of being heard before the suspension order, as per the original Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 21A of the CGST Rules, 2017, was against the principles of natural justice. The drastic implications of such suspension were highlighted, including the inability to make taxable supplies or receive refunds during the suspension period. The Petitioner challenged this omission in both CGST and MGST Rules.Moreover, the Court noted the challenge against both CGST and MGST Rules, necessitating the issuance of a notice to the Attorney General of India and the Advocate General. The Registry was directed to issue the notice, and the Advocate General accepted it without the need for a formal notice. The Court ordered the filing of an Affidavit-in-Reply within three weeks of receiving the notice, with a provision for a Rejoinder to be filed within two weeks thereafter. The Petition was scheduled for listing on a specific date.Furthermore, an ad-interim stay was granted in accordance with prayer clause (c) of the Petitioner's request. This stay aimed to suspend the effect and operation of the impugned show cause notice dated 08.08.2022, which suspended the Petitioner's GST registration. The Court also directed the Respondents to revoke the suspension of the Petitioner's GST registration immediately and restore the same pending the hearing and final disposal of the petition.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
