Port land licence fees not taxable as port service where no service was rendered and only land use permission was granted.

Service tax was not payable on licence fees collected under way leave agreements for laying and maintaining private pipelines on port land, because the port trust merely permitted use of land and did not itself render a taxable service. The agreements required the assessee to construct, maintain, repair and remove the pipelines at its own cost, while the charges were fixed yearly licence fees and were not linked to cargo movement or port scale rates. On that basis, the arrangement did not constitute a port service under the statutory definition or under Section 42 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. The later separate inclusion of renting of immovable property was noted as a distinct development.

---

---

Issues: Whether service tax was leviable on the amounts collected under the way leave agreements as consideration for permitting the assessee to lay, construct and maintain its own pipelines on port land, and whether such permission constituted a port service under the relevant tax provisions and the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

Analysis: The agreements showed that the port trust merely granted permission to use its land for laying and maintaining pipelines at the assessee's own cost, while the assessee itself constructed, maintained, repaired and removed the pipelines and paid a fixed yearly licence fee. The charges were not linked to cargo movement, were not charged according to port scale rates, and did not reflect any service activity by the port trust. Under the statutory definition, port service required a service rendered by a port or by a person authorised by it in relation to a vessel or goods. The Court held that mere grant of permission or licence to use land for a private pipeline did not amount to rendering a service or value addition, and the arrangement did not fall within the services contemplated by Section 42 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. The later inclusion of renting of immovable property was also noted as a separate development.

Conclusion: The levy of service tax on the licence fee under the way leave agreements was not sustainable, because no taxable port service was rendered by the port trust.

---