Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether compensation received on compulsory acquisition of land was taxable as long-term capital gain, or exempt in view of the applicable statutory provisions and CBDT circular.
Analysis: The compensation arose from compulsory acquisition of land covered by the land acquisition regime under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The Tribunal noted the CBDT circular clarifying that compensation received in respect of an award or agreement exempt from levy of income-tax under section 96 of that Act is not taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961, even where the compensation relates to non-agricultural land and even if no separate exemption is available under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal also accepted that the order of the first appellate authority was reasoned and that the Revenue's challenge to the exemption could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The compensation received on compulsory acquisition was not taxable, and the addition made towards long-term capital gain was not justified. The Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Compensation received for compulsory acquisition of land that is exempt from levy of income-tax under section 96 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 is not taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961 merely because no separate exemption provision is invoked thereunder.