Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (9) TMI 330 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Trust's Appeal Dismissed, Denial of Exemption Upheld Under Income Tax Act Section 11 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the denial of exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act due to the applicability of Section 13(1)(b) ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Trust's Appeal Dismissed, Denial of Exemption Upheld Under Income Tax Act Section 11

                            The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the denial of exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act due to the applicability of Section 13(1)(b) concerning the trust's benefit to a specific community. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute taxable income, considering corpus donations as capital receipts and applying a net basis for income computation. The decision highlighted that the trust's focus on the Kadva Patidar community led to the exemption denial.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Denial of exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Applicability of Section 13(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            3. Classification of Kadva Patidar as a religious community or caste.
                            4. Treatment of corpus donations as capital receipts.
                            5. Computation of income on denial of exemption under Section 11.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Denial of Exemption under Section 11:
                            The solitary issue in the present appeal relates to the denial of exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to the assessee, a charitable trust. The ground raised by the assessee was that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] erred in upholding the action of the Assessing Officer (AO) in denying the claim for deduction under Section 11 and in disallowing the deduction of Rs. 15,51,780/- claimed as application of income on objects of the Trust.

                            2. Applicability of Section 13(1)(b):
                            The denial of exemption was based on the finding that the assessee trust was created for the benefit of a particular religious community or caste, specifically the Kadva Patidar, triggering Section 13(1)(b) of the Act. This section denies exemption under Section 11 to trusts created for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste. The AO and CIT(A) both upheld the denial of exemption on this ground.

                            3. Classification of Kadva Patidar as a Religious Community or Caste:
                            The assessee argued that the trust was created for all people of society and not for any particular religious community or caste. They contended that the Kadva Patidars could not be termed a religious community or caste. However, the Tribunal examined the objects of the trust and found that two objects were solely for the benefit of the Kadva Patels, providing boarding and lodging facilities and assistance during marriages. The Tribunal concluded that the Kadva Patels are a caste, characterized by social stratification, defined occupation, lifestyle, and customs. The Tribunal referred to the case of Leuva Patel Nutan Kelwani Mandal vs. ITO, where it was held that Leuva Patels, and by extension Kadva Patels, are not a religious community but a caste.

                            4. Treatment of Corpus Donations as Capital Receipts:
                            The assessee argued that corpus donations received towards the Building Construction Fund, being capital in nature, should be excluded for computing income assessable to tax. The Tribunal acknowledged that corpus donations are capital receipts and not income under the Act, irrespective of whether a trust enjoys the benefit of Section 11 and 12 or not.

                            5. Computation of Income on Denial of Exemption:
                            The assessee contended that if the benefit of Section 11 is denied, income should be computed on a net basis after deducting payments from receipts, not on gross receipts. The Tribunal directed the AO to determine the incomes applied for the benefit of the Kadva Patel community, verify all facts, give the assessee a due opportunity of hearing, and compute the taxable income accordingly.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the denial of exemption under Section 11 due to the applicability of Section 13(1)(b). The Tribunal directed the AO to compute the taxable income of the assessee in accordance with the law, considering the nature of corpus donations and the net basis of income computation. The Tribunal's decision emphasized that the trust's objects for the benefit of the Kadva Patel community led to the denial of exemption under Section 11.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found