Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether police custody remand can be ordered after expiry of the initial period of fifteen days from arrest, where no remand order had been passed earlier and the investigation continued with due diligence.
Analysis: Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 governs remand during investigation and permits detention in police custody or judicial custody, with police custody being limited to the initial period contemplated by law. The Court held that the statutory right of the investigating agency to effectively investigate a serious economic offence cannot be defeated merely because the revisional order granting custody was passed after fifteen days from arrest, where the investigating agency had acted promptly and the question of remand had remained pending. The Court further held that the facts differed from the cited precedent because, in the present case, the accused had not been remanded to judicial custody by the Magistrate when police custody was refused.
Conclusion: The Court held that there is no absolute bar against granting remand in the peculiar facts of the case after the expiry of fifteen days from arrest, and the order granting seven days' remand was valid.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the investigating agency has acted with due diligence and remand has not been finally determined within the initial period, the expiry of fifteen days from arrest does not by itself bar the Court from passing a remand order under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.