Transitional Cenvat credit allowed on depot invoices where duty payment and stock declaration were adequately supported.

Transitional Cenvat credit for textile manufacturers was admissible on inputs in stock, in process, or contained in finished goods where the assessee furnished the required stock declaration and documentary proof of duty payment. Depot invoices were treated as manufacturer invoices because the depots functioned as extensions of the manufacturers, and the invoices, read with factory invoices and manufacturer certificates, established transfer and duty-paid nature of the goods. Minor defects in the documents were curable and could not justify denial of credit without first seeking rectification. The disallowance of credit and the penalty were therefore unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether Cenvat credit under Rule 9A of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was admissible on inputs lying in stock, in process, or contained in finished goods as on 31-03-2003 when the supporting documents were depot invoices and related manufacturers' documents.

Analysis: Rule 9A permitted transitional credit to textile manufacturers on fulfillment of two conditions: a written declaration of stock particulars and documentary evidence of actual duty payment on the inputs. The written declaration was undisputed. The remaining question was whether the assessees had sufficiently evidenced duty payment. The invoices produced, though described as depot invoices, were treated as manufacturers' invoices issued from depots that functioned as extensions of the manufacturers and not as independent dealers. The documents contained particulars of description, quantity, value, and duty paid, and were supported by corresponding factory invoices and manufacturers' certificates showing transfer of the goods from factory to depot and onward sale to the assessees. Any omissions in the invoices were curable defects, and the department had not called for rectification before denying credit. Rule 7(1)(a)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 supported acceptance of such manufacturer invoices for credit purposes.

Conclusion: The assessees satisfied the documentary requirements for transitional Cenvat credit and the disallowance of credit and penalty was unsustainable.

---