Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was triable at the place where the payee maintained the account when the cheque was delivered for collection through that account, and whether any distinction between bearer cheque and account payee cheque affected territorial jurisdiction.
Analysis: Section 142(2)(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 confers jurisdiction on the court within whose local jurisdiction the branch of the bank where the payee or holder in due course maintains the account is situated, where the cheque is delivered for collection through an account. The statutory text does not create any jurisdictional distinction between bearer cheques and account payee or crossed cheques. The cheque was presented through the petitioner's account at Hojai, and dishonour intimation was also received through that bank branch, bringing the matter within the territorial jurisdiction of the Hojai court.
Conclusion: The complaint was triable at Hojai, and the order dismissing it for want of territorial jurisdiction was unsustainable. The petitioner succeeded and the matter was remanded for decision in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: For a cheque presented for collection through the payee's account, territorial jurisdiction under section 142(2)(a) lies with the court where that account is maintained, and the cheque's character as bearer or crossed does not alter that jurisdictional rule.