Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product "Zest Powder" was classifiable as a medicament under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or as a food product under Chapter 21.
Analysis: The product label described it as a protein-rich nutritional formula, a delicious drink, and versatile nourishment, with no specific disease, ailment, dosage, or treatment indication. The product was marketed for everyday consumption like a health food, and the presence of vitamins, minerals, and pharmacopoeial ingredients did not by itself make it a medicament. The fact that manufacture was under a drug licence was held not to be for central excise classification. The Chapter 30 exclusion for food supplements, tonic beverages, and similar products supported classification outside medicaments, and the physician sample labels did not establish use for treatment or prevention of a specific disease.
Conclusion: The product was not a medicament and was correctly classifiable as a food product under Chapter 21; the classification under Chapter 30 failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For central excise classification, the decisive test is the product's essential character as understood in common parlance and its specific therapeutic indication, not the mere presence of medicinal ingredients or a drug licence.