Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Cooperative bank exempt from TDS on interest to nominal members</h1> <h3>Mandheshwari Urban Development Co-op. Bank Ltd., Solapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., Solapur Siddeshwar Sahakari Bank, Samarth Sahakari Bank Ltd., Vyapari Sahakari Bank Maryadit, Versus ACIT, Circle-1, Solapur., ITO, Ward-2 (4) / Solapur/ ACIT, Circle-2, Solapur.</h3> Mandheshwari Urban Development Co-op. Bank Ltd., Solapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., Solapur Siddeshwar Sahakari Bank, Samarth Sahakari Bank Ltd., Vyapari ... Issues:Appeals against orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for different assessment years.Analysis:The appeals were filed by different assessees challenging orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for various assessment years. The Tribunal consolidated the appeals due to identical facts and issues. The specific case discussed pertained to the assessment year 2010-11 of a cooperative bank registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Act. The issue revolved around the non-deduction of TDS on interest paid to certain categories of depositors. The Assessing Officer contended that TDS was required under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, as the bank failed to deduct TDS on interest paid to non-members. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal.The appellant argued that as per the bye-laws of the society, any person conducting banking transactions with the society could become a nominal member. The appellant contended that these nominal members should be considered as members of the cooperative society, thereby exempting the bank from TDS obligations under section 194A. The appellant relied on various judicial precedents, including decisions of the Bombay High Court and Pune Tribunal, to support their position. On the contrary, the ld. CIT-DR argued that members who lack voting rights cannot be treated as cooperative society members, thus disqualifying the bank from the exemption under section 194A(3)(v).The Tribunal analyzed the issue concerning the applicability of the exemption under section 194A(3)(v) to a cooperative bank. It was established that cooperative banks, as a type of cooperative society, are entitled to the general exemption from TDS on interest payments to members. The key contention was whether nominal members, as per the society's bye-laws and the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, could be considered as society members for the purpose of the exemption. Referring to relevant legal provisions and judicial decisions, including the Supreme Court's interpretation of the term 'member' in a cooperative society, the Tribunal concluded that nominal members were indeed members under the law. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the bank was eligible for the exemption under section 194A(3)(v) for interest payments to nominal members, overturning the lower authorities' decisions.As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2010-11 and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on interest paid to nominal members. The Tribunal's decision in this case was deemed applicable mutatis mutandis to the remaining nine appeals of the assessee for different assessment years. Therefore, all ten appeals filed by the assessees were allowed by the Tribunal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found