Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether advances received from flat buyers under a development agreement were taxable as income in the years of receipt, or only in the year of project completion under the project completion method.
Analysis: The land was retained by the landowners until completion of the buildings and conveyance to the buyers' society, and the development arrangement did not transfer the land to the developer during the relevant years. The assessee had consistently followed the completed contract method, and the receipts in the earlier years were only advances against its share of sale proceeds. The project was completed later, occupation certificates were received in the completion years, and the same receipts were offered to tax in those years. On these facts, the receipts did not attain the character of taxable income merely on receipt, and the earlier-year additions would have resulted in premature taxation of the same income.
Conclusion: The advances were not taxable in the years of receipt and were correctly assessed only in the year of project completion; the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where land remains with the owner and the development agreement shows that income from the project is to be recognized only on completion, advances received against future sale consideration do not constitute taxable income in the year of receipt.