Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Conviction upheld under Section 138 NI Act, sentence modified to Rs.10 lakhs compensation.</h1> <h3>Mohammad Sayeed Versus The State of Jharkhand Md. Jamaluddin</h3> Mohammad Sayeed Versus The State of Jharkhand Md. Jamaluddin - TMI Issues Involved:1. Validity of the cheque issuance and its purpose.2. Rebuttal of presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.3. Typographical errors in legal notice and complaint petition.4. Legality of cash transactions under the Income-tax Act, 1961.5. Sufficiency of evidence and documents presented.Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of the Cheque Issuance and Its Purpose:The petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sentenced to simple imprisonment for one year, and ordered to pay Rs.9 lakhs as compensation. The complainant alleged that the petitioner received Rs.7,20,000/- through several account payee cheques and cash, and issued a post-dated cheque (No. 891585) which was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The petitioner argued that the cheque was issued as security for a real estate investment, not as repayment of debt.2. Rebuttal of Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act:The petitioner's counsel argued that the complainant did not approach the court with clean hands and tampered with court papers, including the cheque number. The defense relied on the principle that the standard of proof for rebutting the presumption under Section 139 is 'preponderance of probabilities.' The petitioner cited Supreme Court judgments to support this contention, arguing that the complainant failed to establish the source of funds and did not produce relevant documents.3. Typographical Errors in Legal Notice and Complaint Petition:The complainant's counsel admitted that there was a typographical error in the legal notice and complaint petition, where the cheque number was incorrectly typed as 891584 instead of 891585. However, the original cheque (No. 891585) was marked as Ext. 1, and the petitioner had admitted to issuing this cheque. The court held that such typographical errors do not invalidate the case, as the original cheque and its issuance were undisputed.4. Legality of Cash Transactions under the Income-tax Act, 1961:The petitioner contended that the alleged cash payments violated the Income-tax Act, 1961, which bars large cash transactions. The court did not find this argument sufficient to dismiss the case, as the primary issue was the dishonor of the cheque and not the mode of the original transaction.5. Sufficiency of Evidence and Documents Presented:The trial court found that the complainant provided sufficient material evidence, including the original cheque, cheque return memos, legal notice, postal receipts, and the reply to the legal notice. The petitioner admitted to issuing the cheque and his signature on it. The court concluded that the requirements to establish a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were fulfilled by the complainant.Conclusion:The court sustained the judgment of conviction but modified the sentence. The petitioner was ordered to pay an additional Rs.1 lakh over the Rs.9 lakhs compensation, totaling Rs.10 lakhs, within ten weeks. The sentence of one year imprisonment was modified to this monetary penalty. The court directed that if the petitioner fails to pay the amount, the trial court shall proceed in accordance with the law. The criminal revision application was disposed of with these modifications and directions.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found