TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal emphasizes scrutiny of price reduction in customs valuation, remits matter for fresh consideration.</h1> <h3>Diamond Industries (SBD) Versus Commissioner of Customs, Jamnagar (Prev.)</h3> Diamond Industries (SBD) Versus Commissioner of Customs, Jamnagar (Prev.) - TMI Issues:1. Determination of transaction value for customs assessment based on original MOA price or reduced price indicated in the addendum.2. Examination of genuineness of the addendum and necessity of price reduction.3. Applicability of statutory provisions in determining the value of the vessel under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962.Issue 1: Determination of Transaction ValueThe appeal involved a dispute over the transaction value of a vessel for customs assessment. The Appellant had signed an MOA with a company for the purchase of a vessel for demolition. The original MOA price was reduced by mutual agreement before delivery, but the Bill of Entry was assessed provisionally at the original price. The Appellant argued that the reduced price should be considered as the transaction value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the assessment based on the original MOA price. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of actual payment and the need to scrutinize the genuineness of price reduction. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, remitting the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration on the genuineness of the addendum.Issue 2: Examination of Genuineness of AddendumThe Tribunal highlighted the necessity of examining the genuineness of the addendum entered into between the parties. It noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had not scrutinized the genuineness of the addendum or the reasons for the price reduction. The Tribunal emphasized that in such cases, the authenticity and the reasons behind the price adjustment should be carefully evaluated to determine the correct transaction value for customs assessment. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to reevaluate the matter, particularly focusing on the authenticity of the addendum, keeping all issues open for consideration.Issue 3: Applicability of Statutory ProvisionsIn determining the transaction value of the vessel under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Tribunal considered the statutory provisions and the significance of actual payment as per the addendum. It emphasized that while the original MOA price was a factor, the actual price paid should not be disregarded. The Tribunal stressed the need for a thorough examination of the genuineness and necessity of the price reduction in such cases. The Tribunal's decision to remit the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) was based on the requirement for a fresh consideration of the genuineness of the addendum and the reasons for the price adjustment, ensuring compliance with the statutory provisions.---
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
