Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the payments made to the non-resident university for collaborative research and development of chemical enhanced oil recovery formulations were taxable as royalty or fees for technical services under the India-USA DTAA, and consequently liable to deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment arose from a sponsored research arrangement for developing chemical EOR formulations and field tests. The governing question was whether the non-resident's services amounted to royalty or fees for technical services under the treaty, and whether the treaty's "make available" requirement was satisfied. The statutory scheme under section 9 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 distinguishes royalty from fees for technical services, but section 90(2) requires the treaty definition to prevail where more beneficial. Applying Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA, the relevant test was whether technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes were made available to the assessee so that it could apply them independently in future. On the facts, the agreement showed collaborative research and development, but no transfer of patent, copyright, or technical know-how that enabled the assessee to carry on the work on its own. The services were found not to have made available any technology within the treaty meaning.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services under the India-USA DTAA, and no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195 survived.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA, technical services are taxable only when the service recipient is enabled to apply the underlying technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes independently; absent such "make available" of technology, the consideration is not taxable as fees for technical services or royalty under the treaty.