Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim protection should be granted against coercive action and further proceedings pending challenge to the appellate order and absence of a constituted Tribunal.
Analysis: The writ petition questioned the appellate order under Section 107 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the rectification order under Section 116 of the same Act, and also assailed the subsequent notice issued under Section 73. The Court noted that the statutory Tribunal contemplated under Section 109 had not yet been constituted. In that situation, the Court directed interim protection by restraining coercive steps on deposit of 20% of the tax amount determined by the Appellate Authority and also stayed further proceedings pursuant to the notice dated 13 September 2021.
Conclusion: Interim relief was granted in favour of the petitioner by protecting it from coercive recovery and by staying the subsequent proceeding till the next date.