Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (8) TMI 242 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal decision: Revenue appeal partly allowed, disallowances deleted but interest and bad debts issues restored The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on certain issues and restoring others to the Assessing Officer for ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal decision: Revenue appeal partly allowed, disallowances deleted but interest and bad debts issues restored

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on certain issues and restoring others to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. The disallowance under section 14A of the I.T. Act was deleted due to no dividend income earned, following precedents. The disallowance of provisions for inventory written off was also deleted, as it did not result in a double deduction. However, the disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) and bad debts written off were restored for further examination due to lack of detailed information and compliance proof.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Disallowance made under section 14A of the I.T. Act
                            2. Disallowance of provisions for inventory written off
                            3. Disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act
                            4. Disallowance of bad debts written off

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Disallowance made under section 14A of the I.T. Act
                            The first issue pertains to the disallowance of expenses under section 14A of the Act. During the assessment year, the assessee did not receive any dividend income and hence did not make any disallowance under section 14A. However, the Assessing Officer computed disallowance as per Rule 8D, resulting in a disallowance of Rs. 67,77,174/-. The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance by following his decisions in A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, citing the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's decision in PCIT Vs. Il & Fs Energy Development Company, which supports no disallowance if no dividend income is earned.

                            2. Disallowance of provisions for inventory written off
                            The second issue involves the disallowance of provisions for inventory written off. The assessee debited Rs. 3.88 crore to the profit and loss account for inventory value reduction and made an equivalent reduction in material consumption. The Assessing Officer disallowed this amount, suspecting a double deduction. The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance, referencing his decision in A.Y. 2010-11. The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s relief, noting similar disallowances were deleted in A.Y. 2008-09 and 2009-10 by the Tribunal, and concluded that the accounting adjustment did not lead to double deduction.

                            3. Disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act
                            The third issue concerns the disallowance of interest expenditure related to loans given to subsidiaries. The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 1.47 crore, noting the interest-free loans to subsidiary and associate companies. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, following his decisions in A.Y. 2008-09 and 2010-11. The Tribunal upheld this decision, referencing its own decisions in earlier years where it was established that loans to subsidiaries were given out of own funds. However, for the current year, due to the absence of detailed information on own funds, the Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for re-examination.

                            4. Disallowance of bad debts written off
                            The final issue is the disallowance of bad debts amounting to Rs. 2.01 crore. The assessee claimed bad debts/advances written off, debiting Rs. 151.64 lakhs to the profit and loss account and Rs. 50.27 lakhs to the provision for bad debts account. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim due to lack of proof of liability under section 36(1)(vii) read with section 36(2). The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, referencing his decisions for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Tribunal noted the lack of detailed break-up for the current year and the failure to prove compliance with section 36(2). Consequently, the Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, directing the assessee to furnish necessary compliance details.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on certain issues and restoring others to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. The Tribunal's order was pronounced in the open court on 01.07.2022.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found