Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether customs duty on imported goods became leviable on the date the ship entered territorial waters, on the date of berthing, or only on the date of actual unloading of the goods.
Analysis: The governing principle applied was that import duty is attracted when the goods are unloaded and brought into the mass of goods in India, not merely when the vessel enters territorial waters. Earlier exemption notifications had expired before 1-1-1979, and fresh notifications came into force only on 5-1-1979. Since the actual date of unloading was not established, the correct levy depended on whether unloading took place on 4-1-1979 or on 5-1-1979 or later.
Conclusion: The relevant date for chargeability is the date of actual unloading of the goods. If unloading occurred on 4-1-1979, the assessment already made would stand. If unloading occurred on 5-1-1979 or later, the duty had to be reassessed in the light of the exemption notifications.
Final Conclusion: The appellate court rejected the territorial-waters test, affirmed unloading as the decisive point for levy, and issued consequential directions for fresh consideration depending on the actual date of unloading.
Ratio Decidendi: For imported goods, customs duty becomes chargeable on actual unloading, not on entry of the vessel into territorial waters.