Tribunal overturns AO's decision, directs treating transactions as genuine, deleting additions under Income Tax Act

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to treat the transactions as genuine and to delete the additions made, overturning the decisions of the AO and CIT(A) regarding the treatment of sale proceeds of equity shares as "Income from Other Sources" and the addition of unexplained expenditure under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Treatment of sale proceeds of equity shares as "Income from Other Sources" instead of "Capital Gains."
2. Addition of unexplained expenditure under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Treatment of Sale Proceeds of Equity Shares:
The primary issue in this case was whether the sale proceeds of equity shares of GCM Securities Limited should be treated as "Income from Other Sources" or as "Capital Gains." The assessee declared these proceeds as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and claimed exemption under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] observed that the assessee purchased shares offline from an intermediary and sold them after holding for a little more than one year. The AO noted that GCM Securities Ltd. was identified by the Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation), Kolkata for large-scale rigging to provide bogus LTCG benefits. The AO concluded that the transactions were pre-arranged and treated the entire sale proceeds of Rs. 38,30,904/- as income from other sources, adding it to the assessee's income.

The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the transactions and that the entire sequence of transactions indicated they were accommodation entries and sham transactions. The CIT(A) further noted that the company in which the assessee invested was used to launder money in the guise of LTCG.

2. Addition of Unexplained Expenditure under Section 69:
The AO also added Rs. 1,91,545/- as unexplained expenditure under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, being 5% of the sale proceeds, alleging it as commission paid for obtaining the bogus LTCG. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition, noting that the assessee did not provide any evidence to support her contention against the addition.

Appellate Tribunal's Analysis:
The counsel for the assessee argued that there was no specific evidence against the assessee showing that her unaccounted money was used to earn bogus capital gains. It was also highlighted that all transactions were carried out through account payee cheques/DMAT account, which was not disputed by the Revenue Authorities. The counsel referred to ITAT decisions in the cases of Smt. Aparna Misra and Smt. Rachna Agarwal, where relief was granted to the assessee under similar circumstances involving the same shares of GCM Securities Ltd.

The Tribunal noted that in both cases, the ITAT Kolkata had allowed the appeals in favor of the assessee, stating that the transactions were supported by confirmations, contract notes, DMAT statements, and bank statements. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO did not bring any material evidence to show that the transactions were sham or bogus. The Tribunal also noted that the entire addition was based on a general report of the Investigation Wing, without any specific material implicating the assessee.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the CIT(A) erred in facts and law by treating the sale proceeds as income from other sources and by upholding the addition of unexplained expenditure. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to treat the transactions as genuine and to delete the additions made.

Order:
The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 29-07-2022.

---