Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the denial of Input Tax Credit under Section 19(2)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could be sustained in view of the later amendment held to be curative and declaratory.
Analysis: The impugned assessment reversed the assessee's claim to Input Tax Credit under Section 19(2)(v). The binding view relied upon held that the amendment brought about in 2015 was curative in nature, that it operated retrospectively from 11.11.2013, and that it restored the original position under the provision. On that basis, the right of the manufacturer to avail Input Tax Credit was treated as an absolute right once the inputs were used in manufacture or processing within the State, and the subsequent interstate or intrastate sale of the finished goods did not whittle down that entitlement.
Conclusion: The denial of Input Tax Credit could not be sustained, and the assessee was held entitled to relief.
Final Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the writ petition was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A curative or declaratory amendment to a tax provision relating back retrospectively restores the original entitlement and cannot be used to restrict an accrued Input Tax Credit right already earned under the statute.