Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of waste and scrap retained by a job worker, while clearing finished goods on the value fixed by the principal, forms part of the assessable value under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The goods were cleared on the value fixed by the principal for its customers, and that value was treated as having accounted for all components entering into the price, including the waste and scrap retained by the job worker. The record did not show suppression of any separate job-work consideration to the extent of such waste and scrap. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in Surindra Steel Rolling Mills, which had also been affirmed by the High Court.
Conclusion: The retained waste and scrap did not warrant any separate addition to the assessable value, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order dropping the demand was sustained, leaving no basis for interference in the Revenue's appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where finished goods are cleared on the value fixed by the principal and that value already reflects the components of the transaction, retained waste and scrap does not constitute a separate addition to assessable value absent evidence of a distinct unaccounted consideration.