TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Interpretation of tax provisions for deduction under section 80P</h1> <h3>M/s. Sahyadri Vividdhodesha Areca Belagararamarata Sahakari Sangha Versus ITO, Ward – 5, Shivamogga.</h3> M/s. Sahyadri Vividdhodesha Areca Belagararamarata Sahakari Sangha Versus ITO, Ward – 5, Shivamogga. - TMI Issues:- Denial of deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act to the Assessee by Revenue authorities.Analysis:1. The main issue in the appeals is whether the Revenue authorities were justified in denying the benefit of deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act to the Assessee, a society registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. The Assessee engaged in various activities related to marketing agricultural produce, providing credit facilities, and more, claiming the deduction in the returns for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15.2. The AO and CIT(A) denied the deduction citing Sec.80P(4) of the Act, which excludes co-operative banks from claiming the benefit since AY 2007-08. The amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2006, specified that the deduction under Section 80P does not apply to co-operative banks, except primary agricultural credit societies or primary co-operative agricultural and rural development banks.3. The question arose whether the Assessee qualifies as a co-operative bank. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a previous case emphasized the necessity of having a license from the Reserve Bank of India to operate as a cooperative bank. The CBDT circular clarified that Regional Rural Banks are not eligible for the deduction under Section 80P post-2007-08.4. Referring to a decision by the Karnataka High Court, it was established that co-operative societies engaged in banking activities are entitled to claim deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i). The High Court's ruling emphasized that the legislature intended to exclude only co-operative banks exclusively involved in banking operations, not societies providing credit facilities to members.5. The ITAT's analysis considered the High Court's decision and the recent Supreme Court judgment in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT, which emphasized interpreting Section 80P liberally in favor of the assessee. The Supreme Court clarified that the section does not require the society to be a primary agricultural credit society and that providing credit facilities to non-members does not disqualify the society from availing the deduction.6. Ultimately, the ITAT allowed the Assessee's appeals, directing the deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) to be granted. The judgment highlighted the importance of interpreting tax provisions liberally and reasonably, especially in cases of ambiguity, to benefit the assessee.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
