Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tax Tribunal: Appeal Dismissed, Assessee's Appeal Allowed on Key Points</h1> <h3>The DCIT Circle-6 Jaipur Versus Shri Goverdhan Prasad Singhal And (Vice-Versa)</h3> The DCIT Circle-6 Jaipur Versus Shri Goverdhan Prasad Singhal And (Vice-Versa) - TMI Issues Involved:1. Deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Adoption of value under Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.3. Classification of gain from sale of building as short-term capital gain under Section 50 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.4. Computation of notional rent on old unusable house properties.Detailed Analysis:1. Deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The department contended that the assessee was not eligible for deduction under Section 54F as the assessee owned more than one house property. The CIT(A) allowed the deduction, noting that the properties in question were held as stock-in-trade and not as capital assets. The properties were old, unusable, and not fit for habitation, and the assessee had purchased a new house property within the specified period. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), emphasizing that the properties held as stock-in-trade cannot be considered as capital assets for the purpose of Section 54F. Therefore, the ground raised by the department was dismissed.2. Adoption of value under Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The department argued that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee by considering a lesser value under Section 50C. The assessee contended that the stamp duty value exceeded the fair market value and that the AO failed to refer the matter to the District Valuation Officer (DVO) as required under Section 50C(2). The CIT(A) upheld the AO's action in adopting the stamp duty value but directed the AO to adopt the correct stamp duty value for the buildings. The Tribunal found that the AO should have referred the matter to the DVO upon the assessee's objection and concluded that the CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the AO's action. The Tribunal directed the AO to adopt the actual sale consideration for computing capital gains, allowing the assessee's appeal and dismissing the department's corresponding ground.3. Classification of gain from sale of building as short-term capital gain under Section 50 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The assessee argued that the gain from the sale of the building should be treated as long-term capital gain since the building was kept as an investment for more than three years and no depreciation was claimed. The AO and CIT(A) treated the gain as short-term under Section 50, as the building was part of a block of assets on which depreciation had been claimed. The Tribunal noted that the building was excluded from the block of assets and treated as an investment asset from the assessment year 2013-14. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contention and held that the provisions of Section 50 were not applicable, thus allowing the assessee's ground.4. Computation of notional rent on old unusable house properties:The AO added notional rent to the assessee's income, relying on the decision in CIT vs Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd. The assessee contended that the properties were old, dilapidated, and not fit for habitation. The CIT(A) directed the AO to compute the Annual Letting Value (ALV) based on municipal value, standard rent, and fair rent. The Tribunal found that the decision in Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd. was not applicable as the properties in question were not habitable. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee that the properties were not fit for letting out and allowed the assessee's ground.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the department's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal, providing relief on all contested grounds. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of referring valuation disputes to the DVO and clarified the treatment of properties held as stock-in-trade versus capital assets for tax purposes.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found