Tribunal decision: Dismissal of deemed dividend appeal, allowance of setoff appeal, and condonation of appeal delay

The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals regarding deemed dividend additions under Section 2(22)(e) but allowed the appeal concerning the setoff of the amount taxed as deemed dividend for AY 2014-15. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the issue of setoff. The order was pronounced on 10th May 2022.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Delay in filing the appeal.
2. Correctness of Section 2(22)(e) deemed dividend addition.
3. Setoff of the amount taxed as deemed dividend.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The assessee's appeal ITA No. 609/Pun/2019 was delayed by 800 days. The assessee provided an affidavit attributing the delay to reasons beyond its control. The Revenue did not dispute this claim. The Tribunal found reasonable cause for the delay and, following the precedent set in Collector Land Acquisition Vs. Mst. Katijoi & Ors. (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC), condoned the delay and proceeded to adjudicate the appeal on its merits.

2. Correctness of Section 2(22)(e) Deemed Dividend Addition:
The assessee's appeals IT(SS)A 06 & 07/Pun/2017 involved the issue of deemed dividend additions of Rs.60,92,388/- and Rs.1,08,07,866/- under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) upheld the additions, stating that the amounts received by the assessee from the company were not business receipts but advances. The CIT(A) noted that the appellant was holding 34% of the beneficial shares in the company and had received excess amounts over his entitlement under a Development Agreement. These excess amounts were treated as deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) as they were not in the nature of business advances but financial transactions.

The CIT(A) also addressed the issue of accumulated profits, stating that accumulated profits should not include current year's business profits as per the Supreme Court's decision in Ashokbhai Chimanbhai (56 ITR 42). The CIT(A) concluded that the accumulated profit should be Rs.60,92,388/- and not Rs.1,63,91,548/-. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings, rejecting the assessee's arguments that the sums were commercial transactions and that the deemed dividend should be restricted to 34% of the accumulated profits.

3. Setoff of the Amount Taxed as Deemed Dividend:
In the third appeal ITA 609/Pun/2019 for AY 2014-15, the assessee raised the issue of not allowing the setoff of Rs.16,90,024/- which had already been taxed as deemed dividend. The Tribunal, considering the upheld Section 2(22)(e) addition, directed the Assessing Officer to readjudicate the assessee's grievance afresh as per law. The Tribunal allowed this appeal for statistical purposes, giving the assessee the liberty to file all relevant details in the consequential proceedings.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's former two appeals IT(SS)A 06 & 07/Pun/2017 and allowed the third appeal ITA No. 609/Pun/2019 for statistical purposes. The order was pronounced in the open court on 10th May, 2022.

---