Penalty for withholding entry tax without reasonable cause upheld where the assessee could not rely on relief in separate litigation

Penalty under Section 10(2) of the Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 is discretionary and depends on the assessing authority being satisfied that escapement or under-assessment occurred without reasonable cause. The assessee's withholding of entry tax on the belief that the levy was under challenge, and that interim protection in connected proceedings applied, did not constitute reasonable cause because the assessee was not a party to that litigation and could not claim its benefit. On the facts found, the tax was withheld when due without justification, so penalty was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under Section 10(2) of the Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 was exigible where the assessee withheld entry tax on the stated belief that the levy was under challenge and interim protection had been granted in connected litigation.

Analysis: Section 10(2) makes penalty dependent on the assessing authority being satisfied that the escapement or under-assessment was without reasonable cause, so the levy is discretionary and not automatic. The assessee's reliance on a prior constitutional challenge and the interim order in connected proceedings did not furnish reasonable cause, because the earlier decision did not enure to the benefit of the assessee, who was not a party to that challenge, and the interim order was equally confined to those litigants. The withholding of tax when it became due was therefore not justified on the facts found.

Conclusion: Penalty under Section 10(2) was rightly levied and the answer to the framed question is in the affirmative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under Section 10(2) of the Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 is leviable when tax is withheld without reasonable cause, and a non-party assessee cannot claim the benefit of relief granted in separate litigation to justify such withholding.

---