Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could be sustained when the show-cause notice did not specify the exact alleged contravention and the adverse material was not confronted to the registered person.
Analysis: Cancellation of registration entails serious civil consequences and can be made under Section 29(2) only on existence of the statutory grounds. A notice invoking Section 29(2)(a) must disclose the precise default under the Act or the Rules, together with the material proposed to be relied upon, so that an effective reply can be filed. A vague notice that merely alleges non-compliance, without particulars, denies a meaningful opportunity of hearing and renders the ensuing action irregular and without jurisdictional foundation. Reference in appeal to earlier allegations under other laws could not cure the defect in the cancellation proceedings.
Conclusion: The cancellation order and the appellate affirmation were unsustainable and were quashed. Restoration of registration was directed, while fresh proceedings on cogent material were left open to the revenue.