TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Order Under Section 74 of WBGST Act Set Aside for Denying Requested Personal Hearing, Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision</h1> <h3>Suraj Singh Versus Assistant Commissioner, Asansol Charge, West Bengal Goods and Service Tax & Ors.</h3> The HC set aside an order under Section 74 of WBGST Act, 2017 due to violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner had specifically requested a ... Violation of principle of natural justice - opportunity of personal hearing in spite of specific request made by the petitioner, not provided - HELD THAT:- The impugned order dated is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the officer concerned for passing a fresh order after giving opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner within four weeks from the date of communication of this order. Petition disposed off. Issues involved:Violation of principle of natural justice by not providing opportunity of personal hearing despite specific request made by the petitioner.Analysis:The judgment pertains to a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax under Section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017. The petitioner alleged a violation of the principle of natural justice as no opportunity of personal hearing was provided despite a specific request made in the reply dated 1st March, 2022. The impugned order did not mention any provision of personal hearing being granted or the petitioner's request being considered. The respondent's advocate did not contest this fact, acknowledging the lack of personal hearing despite the petitioner's request.The High Court, after considering the facts and submissions, set aside the impugned order dated 9th March, 2022, and remanded the matter to the officer concerned. The Court directed the officer to pass a fresh order within four weeks, emphasizing the need to provide an opportunity for personal hearing to the petitioner. Importantly, the Court clarified that its decision was solely based on the violation of the principle of natural justice and did not delve into the merits of the case. The writ petition was disposed of with this observation and direction, ensuring that due process and fairness are maintained in the proceedings.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
