APMSIDC's drug procurement and distribution for state government ruled taxable supply under GST despite no profit motive

The AAR, Andhra Pradesh ruled that APMSIDC's procurement and distribution of drugs, medicines, and surgical equipment on behalf of the state government constitutes a taxable supply under GST, despite no profit motive or value addition. The authority determined that absence of profit does not exempt transactions from business classification. APMSIDC's establishment charges from the state government were denied exemption under Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) entries 3 or 3A, as the transaction involved both goods and services rather than pure services, making it ineligible for the claimed exemption.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the procurement and distribution of drugs, medicines, and other surgical equipment by APMSIDC on behalf of the government amounts to "Supply" under Section 7 of CGST/SGST Act.
2. Whether the establishment charges received from the State Government by APMSIDC are eligible for exemption as per Entry 3 or 3A of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Procurement and Distribution as "Supply" under Section 7 of CGST/SGST Act

The judgment examines whether the activities of APMSIDC in procuring and distributing drugs, medicines, and surgical equipment on behalf of the Health, Medical, and Family Welfare Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, qualify as "Supply" under Section 7 of the CGST/SGST Act. According to Section 7, the scope of supply includes all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, license, rental, lease, or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business.

The applicant contended that the procurement and distribution were done on a "no profit/no loss" basis, with no commercial interest, and the government reimbursed the actual amounts incurred. However, the judgment clarified that these attributes do not exclude the transaction from being considered a "supply." The definition of "business" under Section 2(17) includes any trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation, adventure, wager, or any other similar activity, whether or not it is for pecuniary benefit. Therefore, the absence of profit motive does not shield the transaction from being included under "business."

Furthermore, the transaction involved "consideration," as defined in the Act, which includes any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both. The procurement and distribution of drugs and surgical equipment by APMSIDC, involving invoices raised in the name of MD, APMSIDC, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, clearly fall under the definition of "supply."

Issue 2: Exemption of Establishment Charges under Entry 3 or 3A of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)

The second issue addressed whether the establishment charges received from the State Government by APMSIDC are eligible for exemption under Entry 3 or 3A of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The notification exempts pure services provided to the Central Government, State Government, or local authority by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution or in relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution.

The applicant argued that the services provided by APMSIDC are pure services and fall under the functions entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G. However, the judgment noted that the principal activity of APMSIDC involves the procurement of goods (drugs, surgical equipment, etc.), and the ancillary activity is the service component of handling and monitoring the supply. The establishment charges received are for handling and monitoring the activity, but the principal activity involves both goods and services. Therefore, the transaction is not considered a pure service and does not qualify for the exemption under Entry 3 or 3A of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

Ruling:

1. The procurement and distribution of drugs, medicines, and other surgical equipment by APMSIDC on behalf of the government amounts to "Supply" under Section 7 of CGST/SGST Act.
2. The establishment charges received from the State Government by APMSIDC are not eligible for exemption as per Entry 3 or 3A of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

---